One of the sites we visit fairly regularly is called Cool OSX Apps - we subscribe to their newsfeed, and when we see something interesting, we’ll stop by their site. We’ve never had a bit of trouble with them until today, when suddenly Firefox 3 (beta 5) decided that it wasn’t going to permit us to go to their site. Like some sort of overzealous nanny, it popped up an ominous warning in the middle of a black background:

So, naturally we clicked on "Why was this site blocked?", which took us to a big page of information that told us the following:
One or more StopBadware partners are reporting badware behavior on this site.
Reporting Entities
This site is currently (as of 04/14/2008) being reported to StopBadware by the following partners:
Google: reported bad
And on another part of the page…
What is this page?
This page is StopBadware’s information page about www.coolosxapps.net/.
Google has found that some portion of www.coolosxapps.net/ contains or links to badware or otherwise violates Google’s software guidelines.
Some websites intentionally distribute harmful software, while many others have been compromised without the knowledge or permission of their owners. StopBadware reports information provided by Google about these sites (see ‘Reporting entities’ to the left) and offers a process to assist webmasters in removing their sites from Google’s list (see ‘I am the owner of this site’ below).
For StopBadware’s guide to understanding Google’s warning pages, see our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ).
For more information about StopBadware, click here.
Our problem with this is that first of all, this gives us no idea as to whether there really is a threat on this site or not. We doubt the site is any more of a threat than it was yesterday, but sometime in the last day or so, someone at Google or StopBadware decided that we, and anyone else who uses Firefox as our browser, should not be allowed to go to that site. As best we can recall, we never asked for this sort of intervention, so we resent it the way we would resent a busybody neighbor who starts giving unsolicited advice about what we should or should not do "for our own good."
The thing is, had we not been visiting this site semi-regularly for the past few months, we might have been genuinely scared off by this dark red warning on a totally black background. Even the colors were apparently picked to convey a sense of impending danger. This in itself is not a bad thing. There are many inexperienced users on the internet and this color scheme will get a new your attention.
We don’t know about anyone else, but we don’t want either Google or StopBadware denying us the ability to access a site, unless they are willing to tell us precisely what they think is wrong. At our age, we’re not going to accept "Because I said so!" from anybody, even if one of the parties is Google.
So, we dug around in Firefox’s preferences, and on the Security panel we found there is a checkbox you can use to turn off this dubious "assistance":
Uncheck the box, "Tell me if the site I’m visiting is a suspected attack site" and you gag the nanny. Should you do this? That’s up to you. We did, because we’re not going to let some entity with unknown motives (be it Google or StopBadware) decide whether we can get to a web site.
There are at least three things wrong with the way Firefox implements this. First, the warning doesn’t need to be dark blood red on black… that’s just over the top, and needlessly ominous. Second, they need to explain EXACTLY why they are declaring a site bad - for example, if the site happens to have one link on it that will cause us problems if we click on it, then tell us about that link and we’ll be sure to avoid it. But, don’t declare the entire site off limits!
And third, the warning needs a button that allows you to go to the site anyway. Even if it says something like "Okay, you’ve warned me, I’ll take the risk" or something like that, there needs to be a way for a user to bypass the warning on one site without turning off the warning for all sites henceforth.
Right now, the only site we really want to block is StopBadware, until they decide that they should give users enough respect to explain why they are warning about a site. The heavy-handed approach used in Firefox 3 is totally repugnant to us.
As a final comment, we know there are bad people out on the Internet, but we fear that we are all getting too many warnings. For example, every time we download some software program from the Internet, the first time we try to run it we get a warning that this is something we downloaded. No fooling! What a useless warning. It doesn’t tell us anything about whether the software is safe to run, it just acts as though all downloaded software is potentially unsafe, so it had better make us click an extra button before we run it - which by now we do mechanically. If there were ever a real threat, we’d probably click right through and let it run.
Haven’t parents been reading the story of "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" to their children lately? Because it looks to us like the makers of browsers and operating systems sure never heard it.
Related posts
One of the challenges of doing a blog such as this one is getting screenshots of various programs in action, so you’re not just reading plain text. Sometimes you can find appropriate screenshots already provided on a web site, but in other cases you have to try and take them yourself. The Mac has a built-in screen capture facility, but it’s not anything simple like pressing a Print Screen button. Instead, there are actually six options, none of which are exactly intuitive:
- Command-Shift-3 captures the entire screen area and saves it to a file on your desktop
- Command-Control-Shift-3 captures the entire screen area and saves it to the clipboard
- Command-Shift-4 gives you a crosshair cursor. You position it at the starting point, click the left mouse button, and drag to select the area you want to capture. Upon releasing the mouse button, the screen shot will be saved to a file on your desktop.
- BUT if you use Command-Shift-4 and then press the spacebar (instead of using the mouse to define the area), the crosshair changes to a camera. Now use the mouse to drag the camera to an application window you wish to capture, click the left mouse button, and it will capture the entire window to a file on your desktop (including the drop shadow effect).
- Command-Control-Shift-4 operates in the same way as Command-Shift-4 except it copies the screen capture to the clipboard.
- BUT, Command-Control-Shift-4 followed by a press of the spacebar changes the crosshair to a camera, and now operation is the same as if you had pressed Command-Shift-4 followed by the spacebar, except the capture now goes to the clipboard.
And under Leopard only, there are additional possibilities - any of the following keys can be held down while selecting an area (using Command-Shift-4 or Command-Control-Shift-4):
- Space - this locks the size of the selected region and moves it when the mouse moves
- Shift - allows resizing only one edge of the selected region
- Option - resize the selected region with its center as the anchor point
Are you confused yet? There’s lot’s of power there but it’s not exactly easy to remember which command does what, right? And it’s probably a bit more confusing for those of us using PC-style keyboards.
Fortunately there are options for those of us no good at memorization! I’ll just mention three here:
Grab comes with the Mac, but a lot of people may never find it because it’s tucked away, buried in the Applications | Utilities menu. Click on it, and it puts an icon down on the dock, but nothing else obvious happens. The way you use it is that you click on the dock icon, then go up to the top menu bar and use the Grab | Preferences menu to select your preferred pointer type, and whether to enable sound.
But the real action in Grab is at the Capture menu item, which lets you perform four types of captures, as shown at the right.
Each of the menu options opens a small window that lets you do a capture of the type indicated. One thing it won’t do is capture its own windows, which means I can’t show you screenshots of the actual windows, but if you play around with it a bit you’ll get the hang of it. One bit of weirdness is that it doesn’t actually offer to save the capture to a file until you try to close the window, but the thing that makes Grab less than useful is that the images are saved in .tiff format, which means you’ll probably have to use Preview (or another graphics program) to convert the image to a more useable format, such as PNG. On the other hand, Grab does offer the option to take a screen capture with a ten second delay, which could come in handy at times.
Fortunately there are other options available. We happen to like iScreenshot, which simply pops up a small window giving you a shortcut to the same functionality as Command-Shift-4 (with or without the spacebar modifier):
The only drawback of iScreenshot is that it closes itself after each use, so you have to re-run it each time you want to take a screenshot. Still, for one-off screen captures when you can’t remember the doggone keystroke combination, this gives you access to the two most commonly used types.
But, we like software with more power, and free! So in that spirit we present GrabberRaster. According to the author’s site, “GrabberRaster allows you to take repeated screen grabs/captures from almost anything that appears on your Macintosh screen. Grab, resize, and save all in one easy step.”
The instructions for using GrabberRaster are simple:
GrabberRaster is very easy to use.
- Open GrabberRaster
- Click the Dots to resize the Grabber.
- Click the border or use the arrow keys to move the Grabber.
- See something you like, click Grab. You can also copy frames to the Pasteboard.
- Default format is JPEG, but you can choose another.
NOTE: At this time, GrabberRaster works only with your primary display (where your Menubar lives)
We found a couple of situations where GrabberRaster would let us capture something that the Mac’s built-in screen grabber would not, such as when trying to capture how a screen looks while holding down a certain key.
Another interesting free program is SnapNDrag, which allows you to take a screenshot by just clicking a button and dragging the resulting screenshot off.
The SnapNDrag web site explains that to email a screenshot, you would drag the screenshot from SnapNDrag to the Mail application. It is that simple. No hard-to-remember key combinations, no file conversion to deal with, no file dialog boxes to navigate, no temporary files to erase later on. It is able to save files in PNG, TIFF, and JPEG formats.
Our final mention in this category is Timed Screenshot. As the name implies, it will take screenshots every few minutes, so you can see what has happened on the screen over a period of time. As the author’s site explains:
When you launch this application it runs in the background till you kill it on the Terminal or you log out. There is a configuration file (plain text) where you can change some settings like the time interval in seconds, the name of the destination folder (which can be an alias) and the quality of the JPEG compressor in percent.
The files are named e.g. “2003-06-05-21-42-48-0.jpg”. Year, month, day, hour, minute, second and ID of the screen. It should work with multiple screens, but it’s not tested.
The application will quit when you shut down your Mac or you log out. To quit at any time you may need the force quit dialog.
Timed Screenshot seems like the type of program that most folks won’t need, but the few who do need it will find it really useful. However it can also be used for dubious purposes (for example, to see if a significant other is carrying on online cybersex conversations with someone at a distance) so we must point out that some uses of this program might not be legal in your jurisdiction, particularly if the computer you install it on isn’t yours. Don’t break the law!
There are many screen capture programs out there, including some we haven’t mentioned in this article. Our theory is that it’s always good to have more than one tool in your toolbox, in case one doesn’t perform quite as expected.
Related posts